Holy legislation: when it is not evaluated, it is prayed

shornasarker789

In an emblematic work that, in my opinion, is destined to become a classic - if this expression still retains any meaning today - pablo de lora warns us of the inevitable risks entailed by the increasing moralization of public life, a pernicious process that permeates the institutions, laws and political practices of contemporary societies and that enjoys a special significance in our country. Rights in jest it offers much more than a purely circumstantial diagnosis; penetrates deeply into the anatomy of a state that he describes as “kindergarten”, that infantilizes the citizen, turning him into a helpless being permanently in need of care and protection. Individuals, thus deprived of all strength and autonomy, meekly surrender to what professor de lora calls “bureaucracy of consolation”, a formidable administrative machinery that it constantly feeds on the endless grievance that it seeks to eliminate.

The fuel that constantly feeds the flame is, precisely, the Italy Telegram Number Data sanctimony legislation”, a legislative modality that exudes virtuosity, that makes moral ostentation a sign of distinction through the use of inflationary language about human rights, fundamental freedoms, great constitutional ideals, the inalienable equality between all human beings and so on. Icons of a legislation that, rather than prescribing, seems dedicated to raising a kind of secular prayer invoking some unknown ideal. The law no longer orders, organizes or disciplines; rather, he prays through a talk whose objective responds to the fundamental principle of the sanctimonious legislation: in the fight against evil the important thing is to feel good.



This unusual explosion of morality finds its natural habitat in preambles or explanatory statements of the different norms that experience a true inflation of something similar to a kind of singular “legal emotionality”, in constant appeals to founding principles or to mysterious metaphysical entities lacking any empirical reference. The examples are multiple and extend to all types of issues and matters from support to small and medium-sized businesses, to the artificial intelligence supervision agency, regulations related to the environment or food control laws and of course to all related issues. With rights and freedoms. The reason for this is obvious: by its very nature the articles of the rules have a more prescriptive function, has more resistance techniques and offers fewer opportunities to be used as an echo chamber for those great stories that the saintly legislation barely masks. But this is not the aspect I want to highlight now.